Index

1. The time when the most effective campaigns are found.

2. Staples × Kaeden Oblivion: when the creator already works for you.

3. Strava × Kudos Collective: community as amplifier.

4. Where × Extreme Wash Test: the event as an authentic content generator.

5. Hollister × Gigi Perez: artistic voice as differential

6. The common thread among the four campaigns

The influencer marketing market is now worth more than $33 billion globally, according to CreatorIQ, with growth projections showing no signs of slowing.

But “quantitative” growth does not tell the quality of campaigns that really work and how they differ from those that produce impressions without real impact. As we had already noted in the article Creator and brand: from campaign to relationship, the difference between a campaign that builds credibility and one that only generates visibility depends on precise choices:

  • Who you choose,
  • How to get involved,
  • With what creative freedom,
  • at what time.

According to the Sprout Social Influencer Marketing Report 2026, most consumers demand relationality and authenticity, and moves away from overproduced sponsor content and distant mega-influencers.

We also see this dynamic in the agency when we go to build Digital PR and Influencer Marketing campaigns for some brands.

The most effective campaigns in the first quarter of 2026 reflect exactly this trend: none are banking on huge budgets or famous faces as their main leverage. Instead, they focus on relevance, authentic voice, and community building.

2. Staples × Kaeden Oblivion

When the creator is already working for you

Kaeden Oblivion is an employee of Staples-the U.S. office supply chain-who began posting content on TikTok about what can be done with products from the store where she works. Her videos show how to create custom stamps, how to print mugs, and how to save time and money using tools most customers don't even know exist. The result: an engagement rate of 23.4% - 23% higher than similar creators in the same category and measurable increases in store traffic.

The brand did not initiate the partnership when it saw the numbers. It waited until Oblivion fans explicitly asked for official recognition. Only then did Staples comment on the posts, send a personalized care package, and announce the partnership. As CMO Bob Sherwin told the New York Times, reported by Sprout Social, the company reported “measurable increases in in-store traffic and significant increases in categories shown in viral videos.”.

This case is particularly relevant for two reasons. The first: the most authentic creator for a brand may already be within the organization. Employees who speak in their own voice about what they do have a level of credibility that is difficult to replicate with external creators, because their storytelling is by definition based on direct experience. Second, leaving room for that voice to emerge-without controlling every word, without imposing tone or format-produces content that the audience recognizes as real.

3. Strava × Kudos Collective

Community as an amplifier

In celebration of the 2026 Los Angeles Marathon, activity tracking app Strava held an exclusive invitation-only event: a panel preceded by a two-mile run, open to athletes, creators, and founders of local run clubs. No mega-influencers. The creators in attendance were the founders of very specific running clubs: Big Girls Who Run (inclusive by size), Bad at Running (for first-timers), GirlGangCrazy (focused on women), Good Vibes Track Club (one of the largest clubs in Los Angeles). As reported by Sprout Social, the event was part of the Kudos Collective series, an ongoing initiative of the brand.

The logic of the campaign is precise: Strava did not try to reach “runners” as a generic category. It sought to reach specific communities of runners-different in identity, level, approach-through the people who had built those communities. The founders of run clubs are not influencers in the conventional sense: they do not have millions of followers. They do, however, have a kind of trust within their communities that no advertising budget can buy.

For those working in communications, this case shows how the event format can become the tool through which a creator campaign is built without traditional briefs. The creators were not given a text to publish: they participated in something real, with which they identify, and told it in their own voice. The resulting earned media was the result of careful experience design, not a standard commercial deal.

4. Where × Extreme Wash Test

The event as a generator of authentic content

In 2025, Dove took beauty editors and creators to the Atacama Desert in Chile-one of the driest places on the planet-to test its Deep Moisture Body Wash under extreme conditions. The creators documented the experience of showering outdoors, next to active volcanoes, in a landscape without water. The content-authentic, visually stunning, with product testing impossible to simulate-circulated widely well beyond the launch window. As documented by Brandwatch, the campaign remains one of the most cited reference cases in 2026 precisely because the authenticity of the content was structurally impossible to fake.

The logic of the campaign inverts the standard paradigm: instead of asking a creator to produce content about a product, Dove has constructed an experience in which the product proves itself, under conditions that no one could have simulated. The creator does not have to «act» enthusiasm: enthusiasm emerges from the situation. And the viewer recognizes it.

From a PR perspective, this case shows how a properly thought out press trip or launch event generates the kind of coverage that traditional advertising cannot replicate. It is not about taking creators to a beautiful place to have their picture taken with the product. It's about building an experience in which the product plays a real, verifiable role that the creator can tell in his or her own voice because he or she actually experienced it. The content that emerges has structural credibility, not constructed credibility.

5. Hollister × Gigi Perez

The artistic voice as a differential

Hollister, Abercrombie & Fitch Group's apparel brand, launched its most ambitious summer campaign ever in March 2026 by engaging Gigi Perez - an indie singer-songwriter with an established following known for an emotionally powerful cover of a Green Day classic - as the campaign's voice. The collaboration produced an original musical rendition that accompanies the visual campaign, which is distributed on social channels and streaming platforms.

What distinguishes this case is the type of creator chosen. Gigi Perez is not an influencer in the traditional sense: she is an artist with a recognizable voice and an audience that follows her for the quality of what she creates, not for the quantity of content she produces. Hollister did not ask her to wear her own clothes and tell her community about them: it asked her to bring her artistic identity into a brand campaign, letting her create something of her own.

The result is content that speaks to the brand's audience-young people seeking authenticity-through the voice of someone who actually practices that authenticity. The collaboration generates coverage in music, lifestyle and fashion publications that Hollister would not have achieved with a traditional beauty or fashion influencer. The narrative angle multiplies because the creator has his or her own editorial story that overlaps with the brand story.

6. The common thread among the four campaigns

Four very different campaigns in terms of sector, budget and structure.

But in analyzing them, some constants emerge that are worth making explicit.

  • The first is that in no case did the brand control the tone of the content. Kaeden Oblivion He speaks as he speaks, the founders of run club They tell their experience in their own voices, the creators of Dove They document what they experience, Gigi Perez creates with its own artistic identity. In all four cases, the brief did not prescribe the outcome: it defined the perimeter, leaving space for the creator to be himself.
  • The second is that relevance trumped reach. None of the four campaigns targeted mega-influencers with generalist audiences. They all chose creators with specific audiences with whom the brand had something real to share, whether it was a value, an experience, a community, or a language.
  • Third, and perhaps most relevant from a PR perspective, is that three of the four campaigns produced organic (earned media) media coverage that amplified the return well beyond the perimeter of the followers of the creators involved. As we had described in the article When brands become publishers, the distinction between influencer marketing and PR thins when a campaign is built with editorial logic: authentic content produces authentic coverage, which in turn builds lasting credibility.

Read also: Creator and brand: from campaign to relationship e Between traditional media and creator economy: the evolution of PR in the beverage industry.